Traditional Views, Egalitarian Views, and the Child Penalty: Insights from Immigrant Populations in France

Fiche du document

Date

20 décembre 2024

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Dominique Meurs et al., « Traditional Views, Egalitarian Views, and the Child Penalty: Insights from Immigrant Populations in France », Archined : l'archive ouverte de l'INED, ID : 10670/1.088f92...


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This study uses French survey data on immigrants to explore whether the child penalty is driven by traditional gender attitudes. The dataset includes individual perceptions of gender inequality and women's bodily autonomy, alongside fertility histories and labor market trajectories for immigrants living in France during 2019–2020. While women holding more traditional views are less likely to participate in the labor force overall, the child penalty does not appear to be larger for this group. Interestingly, the child penalty accounts for a significantly greater share of the gender gap in labor force participation among those with more egalitarian views. Comparative analyses across immigrants’ upbringing environments and countries of origin further support a causal interpretation of the absence of a relationship between traditional gender attitudes and the child penalty.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets