On the “negative utility” of Ernst Cassirer׳s philosophy of physics: An application to the EPR argument
Fiche du document
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.0b56d5...
- hal: hal-01829055
- doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.07.001
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.07.001
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Cassirer Einstein EPR Completeness Separability LocalitySujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Mental philosophyCiter ce document
Philippe Stamenkovic, « On the “negative utility” of Ernst Cassirer׳s philosophy of physics: An application to the EPR argument », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.07.001
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This paper tries to reconstruct Ernst Cassirer's potential reception of the EPR argument, as exposed by Einstein in his letter to Cassirer of March 1937. It is shown that, in conformity with his transcendental epistemology taking the conditions of accessibility as constitutive of the quantum object, Cassirer would probably have rejected the argument. Indeed, Cassirer would probably not have subscribed to its separability/local causality presupposition (which goes against his interpretation of the quantum formalism as a self-sufficient condition constitutive of the quantum object, without any reliance on spatial intuition), nor to its completeness requirement (as his partial endorsement of Bohr's complementarity, and his rejection of the Kantian "idea of complete determination", illustrate). By rejecting both of its premises, Cassirer's philosophy of physics thus enables to escape the EPR dilemma, and exhibits what, in Kantian terms, might be called a "negative utility" with respect to physical science. A further investigation of the anti-reductionist utility of Cassirer's systematic philosophy with respect to physics and other "symbolic forms" is finally suggested.
