Modest Sociality: Continuities and Discontinuities

Fiche du document

Date

1 janvier 2015

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/jso-2014-0044

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Citer ce document

Elisabeth Pacherie, « Modest Sociality: Continuities and Discontinuities », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1515/jso-2014-0044


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

A central claim in Michael Bratman’s account of shared agency is that there need be no radical conceptual, metaphysical or normative discontinuity between robust forms of small-scale shared intentional agency, i.e., modest sociality, and individual planning agency. What I propose to do is consider another potential discontinuity, whose existence would throw doubt on his contention that the structure of a robust form of modest sociality is entirely continuous with structures at work in individual planning agency. My main point will be that he may be wrong in assuming that the basic cognitive infrastructure sufficient to support individual agency doesn’t have to be supplemented in significant ways to support shared agency.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines