Does Analyst Coverage Impede Long-Term Investments? Evidence from Health and Safety Programs

Fiche du document

Date

2021

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Cairn.info

Organisation

Cairn

Licence

Cairn




Citer ce document

Alexandre Garel et al., « Does Analyst Coverage Impede Long-Term Investments? Evidence from Health and Safety Programs », Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, ID : 10670/1.0i4tu3


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This paper studies the linkage between analyst coverage and Health and Safety (H&S) programs, which have started to emerge in U.S. firms to improve employee health and control healthcare expenditures. Given their homogeneity across firms, their well-documented profitability and long-term payoffs, H&S programs provide an interesting setting to revisit the effect of analyst coverage on long-term investments. We find a strong and negative association between analyst coverage and H&S programs. An instrumental variable approach suggests that the effect of analyst coverage is causal. Cross-sectional analysis indicates that the effect of analyst coverage is more pronounced for firms with a high cost of H&S programs relative to earnings, low blockholder ownership or low long-term investor ownership, and with a low distance of realized earnings to analysts’ earnings forecasts. Overall, these results lend empirical support to the view that analyst coverage deters long-term investments in H&S programs by exerting pressure on managers to meet short-term earnings forecasts.JEL Classification: G24, G32, G34, M14

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en