Judicialisation and Direct Democracy : Switzerland’s Ban on Minaret Construction

Fiche du document

Date

2014

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Cairn.info

Organisation

Cairn

Licence

Cairn



Citer ce document

Hervé Rayner et al., « Judicialisation and Direct Democracy : Switzerland’s Ban on Minaret Construction », Revue française de science politique, ID : 10670/1.1d0663...


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Launched by representatives from the Union démocratique du centre (UDC) with the aim of circumventing political and judicial decisions made at both local and national levels, the 2009 federal popular initiative calling for a ban on the construction of minarets rekindled the stigmatisation of Muslims living in Switzerland. Within the prevalent institutional configuration it moreover revived controversies surrounding issues such as direct democracy versus fundamental rights, or “the will of the people” versus “the power of the judges”, whether national or international. “Judicialisation” is a polysemous concept. It is not understood here as the transfer to the courts of matters of political significance – in this instance the public regulation of religion – but as a process of juridification (or juridicalisation) in which court rulings were constantly anticipated in the political debate provoked by the popular initiative.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines