On Some Objections to The Deductive Closure of Legal Systems

Metadatas

Date

January 1, 2017

Discipline
type
Language
Identifier
Organization

SciELO

License

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Keywords

axioms consequences dynamics descriptions consistency


Cite this document

Hugo R. Zuleta, « On Some Objections to The Deductive Closure of Legal Systems », Crítica (México, D.F.), ID : 10670/1.1v3zhl


Metrics


Share / Export

Abstract 0

SUMMARY I criticize an argument presented by Pablo Navarro and Jorge Rodríguez (2014) against the conception of legal systems as sets of statements closed under logical consequence. First, I show that the example on which they ground their argument incurs in a fallacy of equivocation. Then, I recognize that the authors are right about the fact that two different normative bases can react differently to changes, but I claim that that is not a decisive reason for choosing always the expressly enacted norms as the system’s basis, that the selection of the best basis should be guided by methodological considerations and that, to that purpose, it is necessary to consider the whole set of logical consequences as part of the system.

From the same authors

On the same subjects

Similar documents

Within the same disciplines