Fiche du document
mai 2020
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.236d98...
- halshs: halshs-02562758
- doi: 10.1002/jsc.2328
HALSHS : archive ouverte en Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société - notices sans texte intégral
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/jsc.2328
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
EFM Classification codes: 120, 320, 720, 760 A - General Economics and Teaching/A.A1 - General Economics/A.A1.A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic Methodology/B.B4.B41 - Economic Methodology C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C9 - Design of Experiments/C.C9.C93 - Field ExperimentsSujets proches
Philosophy--Methodology Economic theory Political economyCiter ce document
Jean Servet et al., « The behavioral and neoliberal foundations of randomizations », HALSHS : archive ouverte en Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société - notices sans texte intégral, ID : 10.1002/jsc.2328
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
One-sentence summary : Randomized controlled trials by behavioural economists pretend to be pragmatic and only interested in what really works to solve practical problems but in reality they have notorious normative and ideological aspects. Key points: Behavioural RCTs ignore contexts and composition effects and reflect the biases of those who perform assessments. Behavioural randomizers presume without demonstrating that market exchanges are the most effective form of regulation for societies in all situations of social life. The positive or negative incentives ("nudges") offered by behavioural economics aim to normalize the behaviour of consumers, users, employees or small/independent producers. They are part of a set of power devices by which individual behaviours are shaped and forced, without their knowledge, to conform to dominant class interests.
