Fiche du document
2007
- handle: 10670/1.2p5c8b
Cairn
Sujets proches
Speaking Talking Semeiotics Signs Symbolic representation Symbols Representation, Symbolic Signs Signage Guide signs Sign-boards Signs and sign-boards Guide-posts Guideposts Signs (Advertising) Signboards Speaking Language and languages--Rhetoric Relevancy Pertinence Christian preaching Speaking Homiletics Argumentation Speaking Oratory, Primitive Dramaturgy Addresses Lecturing Speaking Discourses Mimicry Article Oratory, Extemporaneous Speaking Impromptu speaking Competitive examinations Tests Speaking Declamation Dramaturgy Argumentation Speaking Hours (Time) Eras Lists of events Biography--Chronology Chronological listsCiter ce document
Francis Gandon, « La typologie saussurienne des signes à l'aune du tenseur binaire radical », Langages, ID : 10670/1.2p5c8b
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Saussurean signs’typology and Guillaume’s radical binary tensor .This article tests the relevance of Guillaume’s model : radical binary tensor ( « tenseur binaire radical ») in the special field of Saussurean typology of signs. An initial operation of discernment ( « discernement ») generates the structural sign through three phases : onymics ( « onymique »), 1898 ; so called phonetic « laws » ; mimicry ( « mimologie », resemblance between the two faces of the symbol). A first kind of diachrony, as a move to limit ( « marche à l’étroit ») is generated.The structural sign eventually fits into a move to widen ( « marche au large ») through linearity of speech and consecutiveness (or « rhapsody ») of legend. Such a « progress to wide » finally reverses itself as a disarticulation between significant ( « signifiant ») and signification ( « signifié ») : « kénôme », « tourbillons » (whirlwind), void.Such a dramaturgy does not coincide with the diachronic production of concepts : it converts the latter into a logical chronology ( « chronologie de raison ») according to which there is, strictly speaking, no evolution within Saussure’s thought.