Inner Awareness as a Mark of the Mental

Fiche du document

Date

30 août 2022

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2280-7853

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2239-4028

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess



Sujets proches En

Mark

Citer ce document

Jakub Mihálik, « Inner Awareness as a Mark of the Mental », Phenomenology and Mind, ID : 10670/1.3johht


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

While for Brentano it is a mark of the mental that any mental state is an object of inner awareness, this suggestion is notably rejected by the Higher-Order Thought Theory (HOTT) of consciousness that posits non-conscious inner awareness, which isn’t an object of inner awareness, and yet is mental. I examine an objection against the HOTT, according to which inner awareness is phenomenally present in ordinary consciousness. To assess the objection, I investigate arguments of Chalmers and Montague in favor of this phenomenal presence. I argue that while these arguments may show that experience is not transparent, they crucially fail to demonstrate that ‘inner transparency’ must be false too, i.e. that inner awareness is phenomenally present. I conclude that non-conscious inner awareness is an open possibility and Brentano’s posit of inner awareness as a mark of the mental thus looks unpromising.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en