Fiche du document
12 mai 2022
- handle: 10670/1.3kzvxi
- halshs: halshs-03665629
- doi: 10.2147/PPA.S354705
- PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC9112797
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/PPA.S354705
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
digital questionnaire non-adherence drivers psychometric validation Rasch modelling -bio]/Human health and pathology -bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behaviorSujets proches
Tally sticks Scores Notched sticks Methods of analysis Analysis and chemistry Analytical methods Chemical analysis Analysis methods Analysis and examinationCiter ce document
Elodie de Bock et al., « Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool », HAL-SHS : droit et gestion, ID : 10.2147/PPA.S354705
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Purpose: The SPUR (Social, Psychological, Usage and Rational) Adherence Profiling Tool is a recently developed adaptive instrument for assessing key patient-level drivers for non-adherence. This study describes the SPUR questionnaire’s finalization and psychometric evaluation. Patients and methods: Data were collected through an online survey among patients with type 2 diabetes included by general practitioners and diabetologists in France. The survey included four questionnaires, SPUR and three validated adherence measures: BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT. Item-level analysis and a Partial Credit Model (PCM) were performed to refine the response option coding of SPUR items. The final item selection of SPUR was defined using a PCM and a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Construct validity, concurrent validity and known-groups validity were assessed on the final SPUR questionnaire.Results: 245 patients (55% men, mean age of 63 years) completed the survey remotely, and were included in this analysis. Refining response option coding allowed a better discrimination of patients on the latent trait. After item selection, a short, an intermediate, and a long form composed the final SPUR questionnaire. The short form will be used to screen patients for risk and then the other forms will allow the collection of further information to refine the risk assessment and decide the best levers for action. Results obtained were supportive of the construct validity of the forms. Their concurrent validity was demonstrated: moderate to high significant correlations were obtained with BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT scores. Their known-groups validity were shown with a logical pattern of higher scores obtained for patients considered non-adherent and significant differences between the scores obtained for patients considered adherent versus non-adherent.Conclusion: SPUR is a valid tool to evaluate the risk of non-adherence of patients, allowing effective intervention by providing insights into the respective individual reasons for lack of adherence.