Fiche du document
21 août 2024
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.40c292...
- hal: hal-04680504
- doi: 10.24072/pci.orgstudies.100004
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.24072/pci.orgstudies.100004
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
AssessmentCiter ce document
Denis Tagu et al., « Academic work as craft: Towards a qualitative and multicriteria assessment », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.24072/pci.orgstudies.100004
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours' contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the "utility" judgment from those in hierarchy and the "beauty" judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the "beauty" judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
