Fiche du document
2 février 2023
- handle: 10670/1.40u0y7
- hal: hal-04017607
- SCIENCESPO: 2441/6jgodgvmot8grrbkpqfja94eu1
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/6jgodgvmot8grrbkpqfja94eu1
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//759707/EU/Nuclear Weapons Choices Governing vulnerabilities between past and future/NUCLEAR
Mots-clés
nuclear weapons injustice theory of change nuclear studies Cold War history, nuclear deterrence, nuclear disarmament, nuclear nonproliferationCiter ce document
Benoît Pelopidas, « Nuclear injustice: Suggestions in support of a research agenda », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10670/1.40u0y7
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In their recent essay in the Bulletin, Frankiska Stärk and Ulrich Kühn reassess the “distribution of the costs and benefits of nuclear deterrence” and set up a research agenda about nuclear (weapons) (in)justice (on humans but not the planet). I will not engage here with the scope of their proposed agenda, their implicit definition of justice, theory of change, and the implicit separation between nuclear power and weapons; I will not engage either with their claims about desirable nuclear weapons policies. I will simply identify and applaud ways in which they avoid common traps in nuclear studies, and then I will indicate problems with their propositions given what they say they want to do. Finally, I will suggest ways to address these problems.