Market stability vs. market resilience: Regulatory policies experiments in an agent-based model with low- and high-frequency trading

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.013

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/6ummnc8nko827b2luohnctekk7

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//640772/EU/Distributed Global Financial Systems for Society/DOLFINS

Organisation

Sciences Po

Licences

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Sujets proches En

Pattern Model

Citer ce document

Sandrine Jacob Leal et al., « Market stability vs. market resilience: Regulatory policies experiments in an agent-based model with low- and high-frequency trading », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.013


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

We investigate the effects of a set of regulatory policies directed towards high-frequency trading (HFT) through an agent-based model of a limit order book able to generate flash crashes as the result of the interactions between low- and high-frequency traders. In particular, we study the impact of the imposition of minimum resting times, of circuit breakers, of cancellation fees and of transaction taxes on asset price volatility and on the occurrence and the duration of flash crashes. Monte-Carlo simulations reveal that HFT-targeted policies imply a trade-off between market stability and resilience. Indeed, we find that policies able to tackle volatility and flash crashes also hinder the market from quickly recovering after a crash. This result is mainly due to the dual role of HFT, as both a cause of flash crashes and a key player in the post-crash recovery.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en