Normalizing and regularizing slums: what explains the sidelining of onsite interventions in Europe? Comparing Paris and Madrid
Fiche du document
2016
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.458c88...
- hal: hal-03470000
- SCIENCESPO: 2441/6qk9it1od993g8nud6qd2d7qvh
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/6qk9it1od993g8nud6qd2d7qvh
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Europe Slum Housing policy Poor areaSujets proches
Council of Europe countriesCiter ce document
Thomas Aguilera, « Normalizing and regularizing slums: what explains the sidelining of onsite interventions in Europe? Comparing Paris and Madrid », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10670/1.458c88...
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Raising the question of normalizing, upgrading or regularizing slums[1] in Europe could be seen as provocative at a time when all local and national governments are very often doing everything they can to raze slums – perceived as the shame of this twenty-first century’s civilized world and as a reflection of housing policy failures since the 1950s, and when associations that support slum dwellers and ensure their daily survival have been campaigning for years for the implementation of integration projects to promote housing and jobs. (First paragraph)
