Fiche du document
2024
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.4848a0...
- isbn: 9781032396316
- hal: hal-04713427
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Thinking Thoughts Mind Social science Sciences, Social Human sciences Social studies Behavioral sciences Mind Science, Mental Mental philosophy Mind Behavioral sciences Mental philosophy Papers Mind-body connection Somatopsychics Mind-cure Body and soul (Philosophy) Mind-body relations Body and mind Human body--Psychological aspects Mind Inflection Language and languages--Inflection Human intelligence Intelligence Mind Inflection Inflectional morphology Language and languages--Inflection Understanding Ris-med (Lamaism) Buddha and Buddhism Lamaism Cerebrum Mind FallCiter ce document
Michel Bitbol et al., « Mindful clarification: why it is necessary to necessary to reply once again to Stone and Zahavi », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10670/1.4848a0...
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
According to their response (to which we, in turn, respond with the present paper), Stone and Zahavi did not really claim that phenomenology is "exclusively concerned with the mind-world correlation," and thus did not fall into the trap of an abstract dualistic separation between mind and world. This inflection opens the way to a richer understanding of phenomenology that is more likely to be compatible with Buddhism. They also remind us that Dan Zahavi has rightly argued for decades that epoché and reduction are "essential to phenomenological philosophy. This latter remark strongly mitigates the original claim made by Stone and Zahavi in their "Phenomenology and Mindfulness" that epoché and reduction are not "indispensable" to "phenomenology".
