Fiche du document
2018
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.57a204...
- hal: hal-02102339
- doi: 10.5751/ES-09848-230115
- PRODINRA: 421269
- WOS: 000432464800013
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-09848-230115
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
actionable framework concerted ecosystem service management multistakeholder approach participatory action research rural landscapes agroecological transition territorial management -bio]/Ecology, environment -bio]/Ecology, environment/EcosystemsSujets proches
Military strategy Natural science Sciences Science of science Administration Natural scenery Countryside Landscape Scenery Scenic landscapes Ecological science Environmental biology Bionomics Ecological sciences Environment Balance of nature Oecology Biology--Ecology Ecological processes Social action--Research Services, EcosystemCiter ce document
Cécile Barnaud et al., « Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.5751/ES-09848-230115
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The governance of ecosystem services (ES) has been predominantly thought of in terms of market or state-based instruments. Comparatively, collective action mechanisms have rarely been considered. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a conceptual framework that brings together ES, social interdependencies, and collective action thinking. We use an ES conceptual lens to highlight social interdependencies among people so as to reflect on existing or potential collective actions among them. This framework can also contribute to increasing people’s awareness of their mutual interdependencies and thereby fostering, framing, or enriching collective action, in ways that take into account the diversity and complexity of ecological processes underlying human activities. Our approach can contribute in particular to agroecological transitions that require landscape level innovations and coordination mechanisms among land users and managers. The framework distinguishes three types of social interdependencies: (i) between ES beneficiaries and ES providers, (ii) among beneficiaries, and (iii) among providers. These social interdependencies are in turn analyzed according to four main dimensions that are critical for collective action: (i) cognitive framing of interdependencies, (ii) levels of organization, (iii) formal and informal institutions, and (iv) power relations. Finally, we propose a strategy to turn this framework into action in contexts of participatory action research, a strategy grounded on a number of methodological principles and tools that convey complexity and increase people’s awareness of interdependencies in agrarian social-ecological systems.
