Fiche du document
10 mai 2023
- handle: 10670/1.5q5x3g
- hal: hal-04094363
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//951393/EU/Nanobubbles: how, when and why does science fail to correct itself?/NanoBubbles
Sujets proches
Natural science Sciences Science of science Deceit Commercial fraud Misrepresentation (Crime)Citer ce document
Frédérique Bordignon et al., « Fraud, exaggerations, and ghost authorship: questioning the reliability of the scholarly record », HAL-SHS : sciences de l'information, de la communication et des bibliothèques, ID : 10670/1.5q5x3g
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The credibility of science is regularly undermined by highly prominent cases of fraud, but it also suffers from more discreet examples of bad practices and misconduct, which can be just as harmful. Concerned scientists focus on studying academic production, with projects designed to identify anomalies and errors in the literature, in order to gain insights into the causes and study possible correction mechanisms. The authors of this article are contributors to one such project, called NanoBubbles.Link to the post