Is Magnitude a Decisive Factor in Electoral Victory? The 2004 European Elections in France and the Effects of Change in the Electoral System

Fiche du document

Date

2010

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Cairn.info

Organisation

Cairn

Licence

Cairn



Citer ce document

Bernard Dolez et al., « Is Magnitude a Decisive Factor in Electoral Victory? The 2004 European Elections in France and the Effects of Change in the Electoral System », Revue internationale de politique comparée, ID : 10670/1.668dbc...


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Contemporary political science research has shown that magnitude, i.e., the number of seats at stake per constituency, is the single most important factor regardless of type of electoral system. Recent French electoral reforms applied to the 2004 European elections provide an interesting case through which to assess this claim and to test its validity. Since the reform only changed one rule, namely magnitude, the main goal of this paper is to test the temporal and spatial impacts of this reform on the results. First, we compare the 2004 results with those of previous European elections in which magnitude was higher. Second, we conduct a constituency-level analysis of the 2004 European elections results since the number of seats at stake differs according to constituency. Finally, the study confirms the effect of magnitude on the party system. More specifically, it shows both its mechanical effects on parliamentary representation and its psychological effects on voters.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines