Fiche du document
2015
- handle: 10670/1.6dz2v0
- hal: hal-01891961
- doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7
- SCIENCESPO: 2441/4u6bdim0o89889eec3jg6jrk0v
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/4u6bdim0o89889eec3jg6jrk0v
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Corporate Social Responsability Political responsability Business Political CSR Neoliberalism Paternalism Trusteeship Globalization Stakeholder democracySujets proches
Global cities Internationalization Globalisation TradeCiter ce document
Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic et al., « Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This article provides a historical analysis of the political role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) before it was even called CSR. We describe two ideal types of political responsibilities during the eras of 19th century paternalism in Europe and corporate trusteeship in the US. Our historical contextualization of recent scholarly work on a “political turn” of CSR offers a two-pronged critique: 1. Growing discussions on political CSR start from a problematic foundation that does not hold in historical perspective – the taken-for-granted null hypothesis of a separation between business and state responsibilities. 2. The causal relationship of a political turn of CSR with globalization is misconceived and we show strong forms of political CSR well before our contemporary neoliberal globalization. We suggest that business and political responsibilities are structurally and have always been intimately intertwined and are constantly negotiated and re-negotiated. We propose this as an alternative null hypothesis, one that could frame future theorizing on political CSR. Finally, while we show that globalization is not the cause of political CSR, we suggest that it has nevertheless had a consequential impact, shaping the specificities of the contemporary political role of business. We conclude by drawing implications for future theorizing on (political) CSR and stakeholder democracy.