Une lecture chinoise d’Arnold Toynbee: Zhang Junmai et le problème de la continuité historique de la culture chinoise
Fiche du document
1 mars 2016
- handle: 10670/1.6gjbmk
- halshs: halshs-03524784
- doi: 10.1515/asia-2015-0052
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/asia-2015-0052
Sujets proches
Cultural sociology Culture--Social aspects Sociology of cultureCiter ce document
Joseph Ciaudo, « Une lecture chinoise d’Arnold Toynbee: Zhang Junmai et le problème de la continuité historique de la culture chinoise », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1515/asia-2015-0052
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The historical continuity of Chinese culture from the early dynasties to modern times is a common topic in Chinese “culturalist discourses”. The intellectuals who wanted to defend the legitimacy of a Chinese culture compatible with modernity almost never put it into question. Zhang Junmai (1887–1969), in a short book entitled the Chinese culture of tomorrow (1936) had the same attitude toward the problem. He spoke about the ‘four thousand years of Chinese civilization’. However, taking this stand is not without raising issues, for Zhang begins his text by building his theory of cultures upon many ideas defended by Arnold Toynbee, in his major work A study of History (1931). As a matter of fact, Toynbee used to divide the history of China into two periods: the Sinic society, and the Far Eastern society. In introducing Toynbee’s studies in China, did Zhang purposely change important aspects of the Study or was he simply lost in translation? Incidentally, was quoting Toynbee simply instrumental in Zhang’s discourse? These are the main questions this research note aims at tackling.