Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation. The management of argumentation in a public debate in France
Fiche du document
2022
- handle: 10670/1.85eef8
- hal: hal-03737314
- doi: 10.1075/jaic.21021.dou
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1075/jaic.21021.dou
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Argumentation Contending, Verbal Oral self-defense Disputing Argumentation Argumentation Ratiocination Argumentation Speaking Oratory, Primitive Argumentation Dialectic (Logic) Deduction (Logic) Deductive logic Logic, Deductive Argumentation Argumentation SpeakingCiter ce document
Marianne Doury et al., « Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation. The management of argumentation in a public debate in France », HAL-SHS : sciences de l'information, de la communication et des bibliothèques, ID : 10.1075/jaic.21021.dou
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which seek to stimulate a citizen's argumentative expression. Based on a case study (the public debate on a gold mine project in French Guiana), we observe the norms that govern such participation processes and their implementation in the argumentative exchanges.