Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107213

Collection

Archives ouvertes



Citer ce document

J.-M. Blazy et al., « Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107213


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Soil organic carbon stocks have been declining for more than a century, mostly in the tropics. Maintaining soilorganic matter is critical to tackling climate change and controlling soil health. One way to address this problemis to encourage farmers to improve soil carbon on their farms. We provide an ex-ante assessment of the costeffectivenessof innovative Agri-Environmental Measures (AEM) that subsidize the use of compost. To do so,we ran a choice experiment in Guadeloupe, in the northeastern Caribbean, where there is an urgent need topreserve soil organic matter levels. The 305 farmers who participated were asked to choose one of several AEMthat offer financial support in exchange for using compost in their farming activities, as well as free technicalassistance, a collective financial bonus, and the possibility of combining chemical fertilisers with composts. Wefound that offering free technical assistance increases the participation rate by 30 percentage points and offeringa collective bonus increases it by 14 percentage points. In contrast, including a requirement on the reduction ofchemical fertilization would decrease the probability of participation by only two percentage points. We thenestimated the amount of carbon that would be sequestered in the soil using compost as prescribed under each ofthe AEM proposed. We found that the most effective AEM would sequester up to 25,000 teqCO2 per year at theterritory level and that the most cost-effective scheme would reach this target at a cost of about 500 euros perteqCO2. Finally, we find that the so-called 4 per 1000 target could be reached through AEM under a variety ofscenarios.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en