Fiche du document
8 avril 2024
- handle: 10670/1.926c2t
- hal: hal-04538870
- doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3a7f
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3a7f
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
climate change mitigation fossil fuel ban residential sector energy mix policy assessment D - Microeconomics/D.D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics/D.D1.D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory H - Public Economics/H.H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue/H.H2.H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q41 - Demand and Supply • PricesSujets proches
Energy resources Power supply Energy Energy Conservation of energy Correlation of forces EnergyCiter ce document
Célia Escribe et al., « Phasing out fossil fuel in the residential sector: Should new gas boilers be banned ? », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3a7f
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The low uptake of low-carbon heating systems across Europe has prompted au- thorities to consider more ambitious measures, including a complete ban on the instal- lation of new fossil fuel boilers. In this analysis, we assess this measure by simulating 3,072 scenarios covering major uncertainties in a framework that includes both real- istic policy response and key interactions between the residential and energy sectors. Taking France as a case study, we demonstrate that the ban is critical to meet car- bon neutrality. Despite costly investments in heating system, the ban leads to higher cost-effectiveness across uncertainties, by saving additional flexibility capacity in the energy system. We finally illustrate how a well-designed subsidy program is instrumen- tal in mitigating horizontal and vertical inequalities that may arise from the policy’s implementation.