The Making of Scientific Evaluation : Algorithm, Data Games, and Bibliometric Tools

Fiche du document

Date

2013

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Source

Réseaux

Collection

Cairn.info

Organisation

Cairn

Licence

Cairn



Citer ce document

David Pontille et al., « The Making of Scientific Evaluation : Algorithm, Data Games, and Bibliometric Tools », Réseaux, ID : 10670/1.96729f...


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

In contrast with the image of bibliometrics as a unified and coherent whole, this article identifies three major components of information infrastructures that support the evaluation of scientific research: algorithms, datasets, and bibliometric tools. Tracing the genesis and success of some of these components, from 1960 to the present day, the authors identify several configurations which differentially articulate the position of dataset producers, the target of algorithms, and the form of bibliometric tools. This diachronic narrative shows repeated encounters between bibliometrics and webometrics and highlights the fact that any assessment is necessarily based on a definition of relevant peers.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines