2015
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Antonio Duplá Ansuategui, « ¿Peor que un esclavo? Hostis publicus en la época ciceroniana », Actes du Groupe de Recherches sur l’Esclavage depuis l’Antiquité, ID : 10670/1.a4ehjk
Following Appianus’ narrative in his History of Rome, the citizens included in the lists of proscriptions in 43 B. C. pleaded with their slaves in vain for help and mercy, in a situation of chaos, violent repression and brutal alteration of property rights. This transformation of the social relationships reflects the peculiar status of these citizens who, after the triumvirate’s decision, had lost all their rights and could be put to death by anyone. This new status is connected to a controversial figure of the last republican century, that of hostis publicus, created by a senate’s decree for the first time in the civil war between Sulla’s partisans and those of Marius. This paper deals with the analysis of this figure, his polemical legal character and the alteration it entails of the civic condition of a citizen by a purely political procedure, without any legal sentence. In practice, the people involved find themselves in a no-man’s land, in a situation legally and socially far more unprotected than that of slaves.