Fiche du document
2018
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.a925bb...
- halshs: halshs-01882108
- doi: 10.1007/s00355-018-1133-5
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00355-018-1133-5
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
break-up of groups voting behavior public goods Decentralization experiment C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C9 - Design of Experiments/C.C9.C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • SecessionSujets proches
Polls Goods, Public Animal behavior Habits and behaviorCiter ce document
Tjaša Bjedov et al., « Does decentralization of decisions increase the stability of large groups? », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1007/s00355-018-1133-5
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Using a laboratory experiment with nested local and global public goods, we analyze the stability of global groups when individuals have the option to separate, according to the degree of decentralization of decision-making. We show that increasing the number of decisions made at the local level within a smaller group reduces the likelihood that individuals vote in favor of a configuration that includes no global good for interacting only within their local group. Voting for such a configuration is more likely when global group members are less cooperative and local group members are more cooperative. Reinforcing local group identity has no impact on votes.
