Fiche du document
2013
- handle: 10670/1.anyfs9
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1023-2044
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_05FA4D14BB0B0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Mots-clés
controversy, critical mediation, enunciation analysis, phenomenology, sociology of public spheresSujets proches
Work, Method of Industry (Psychology) Method of work Conation Volition Cetanā Luck Methods of analysis Analysis and chemistry Analytical methods Chemical analysis Analysis methods Analysis and examinationCiter ce document
P. Gonzalez, « La controverse avant le film : quelle politique pour Good Night, And Good Luck ? », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10670/1.anyfs9
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This article aims to explain how newspapers commented on the movie Good Night, and Good Luck before its release. The media coverage anticipated George Clooney's film as a partisan attack launched against George W. Bush's policy since 9/11. Clooney advocates another reading: the historic confrontation between journalist Edward Murrow and Senator Joseph McCarty permits to reflect on the crucial role that the media play for democracy. Such reflection tries to prevent the dividing of the public sphere into antagonistic camps opposing "friends" to "foes," a division that undermines the possibility of a true pluralism. Our socio-semiotic analysis will focus on the critical work accomplished by the media, and on the way that work determines the collective meaning of a cultural object. Simultaneously, we will discuss the necessary conditions for pluralism in a public sphere.