Fiche du document
1 octobre 2012
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.b1d89c...
- hal: hal-02396133
- SCIENCESPO: 2441/dambferfb7dfprc9lie430oq8
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/dambferfb7dfprc9lie430oq8
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Conation Volition Cetanā Natural science Sciences Science of science Service of process Service of papers Abuse of process Process Political thought Government Political theory Civil government Commonwealth, The Science, Political Administration Politics Papers Negotiations Bargaining Haggling Negotiating Higgling Dickering Legislatures Bicameralism Unicameral legislatures Parliaments Documents Documents, Legal Documents Public documents Official publications Government documents Documents Documents Indentures Bargains Mutual arrangements Arrangements, Mutual Documents Charters--Law and legislation Documents Manuscript repositories Manuscript depositories Manuscripts--Repositories Manuscripts--Depositories Influence and resultsCiter ce document
Katrin Auel et al., « Lost in Transaction? Parliamentary. Reserves in EU bargains », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10670/1.b1d89c...
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Parliamentary scrutiny reserves have become a popular parliamentary instrument for the scrutiny of EU documents over the last two decades. While the exact provisions for them vary between the member states and according to their parliaments’ overall scrutiny system, parliamentary reserves generally mean that government representatives do not, or cannot, officially agree to a proposal in the Council (or COREPER or the working groups) while the parliamentary scrutiny process is ongoing. Yet despite the proliferation of reserve provisions, we actually know very little about them. The paper will therefore provide an overview over the specific features of scrutiny reserves in different member states. In addition, it investigates whether scrutiny reserves actually are an effective instrument to safeguard parliamentary influence in EU affairs by looking at how they are being dealt with at different levels of the Council negotiations.
