Flow approaches in agri-food systems research: revealing blind spots to support social-ecological transformation
Fiche du document
1 janvier 2025
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.b9b245...
- hal: hal-04773727
- doi: 10.1080/21683565.2024.2421977
- WOS: 001349932100001
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/21683565.2024.2421977
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/licences/copyright/
Mots-clés
Responsible consumption and production Agroecology Social metabolism LCA Environmental footprint Environmental justice -bio]/Ecology, environment -bio]/Agricultural sciences/AgronomySujets proches
Natural science Sciences Science of scienceCiter ce document
Sandrine Allain et al., « Flow approaches in agri-food systems research: revealing blind spots to support social-ecological transformation », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1080/21683565.2024.2421977
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Agrifood systems are called upon to undergo profound transformation. The development of “flow approaches” (including lifecycle assessment, carbon footprint, ecological footprint, and metabolism methodologies) has been crucial to point to the material side of human activities. More specifically, these approaches highlight the material and energetic costs of long agrifood value-chains, intensive farming practices, high levels of geographic specialization, as well as the production of non-food commodities. In the logical progression from diagnosis to action, flow approaches are currently being used as decision-support tools. But what are the biases induced by flow approaches when it comes to supporting real-world transformations? Based on our experience and interdisciplinary background, we argue that flow approaches provide a decontextualized and narrow framing of issues related to agrifood systems, such as accumulations and transfers across space and time, inequalities and asymmetries along the chain of activities, or long-lasting environmental impacts. Some aspects are measured and emphasized, while others are difficult to observe or neglected. Flow approaches, alone, are not well suited to inform issues of environmental justice, radical transformation, and local governance. As in most cases methodological advances will not suffice to overcome the biases induced; we call for hybridizing methods and for broadening analytical perspectives.
