Fiche du document
1 janvier 2023
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.bcc90b...
- hal: hal-04399952
- doi: 10.1017/S1930297500008895
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S1930297500008895
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
reasoning heuristics and biases debiasing intuitionSujets proches
Skills trainingCiter ce document
Esther Boissin et al., « Debiasing System 1: Training favours logical over stereotypical intuiting », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1017/S1930297500008895
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Whereas people’s reasoning is often biased by intuitive stereotypical associations, recent debiasing studies suggest that performance can be boosted by short training interventions that stress the underlying problem logic. The nature of this training effect remains unclear. Does training help participants correct erroneous stereotypical intuitions through deliberation? Or does it help them develop correct intuitions? We addressed this issue in four studies with base-rate neglect and conjunction fallacy problems. We used a two-response paradigm in which participants first gave an initial intuitive response, under time pressure and cognitive load, and then gave a final response after deliberation. Studies 1A and 2A showed that training boosted performance and did so as early as the intuitive stage. After training, most participants solved the problems correctly from the outset and no longer needed to correct an initial incorrect answer through deliberation. Studies 1B and 2B indicated that this sound intuiting persisted over at least two months. The findings confirm that a short training can debias reasoning at an intuitive “System 1” stage and get reasoners to favour logical over stereotypical intuitions.
