DEVENIR INMORTAL. LA CRÍTICA DE QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX A LA FILOSOFÍA DE LA INMANENCIA DE GILLES DELEUZE
Fiche du document
2016
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.bd4d30...
- 1665-1324
Ce document est lié à :
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa
Signos Filosóficos
Mots-clés
Filosofía GOD REALISM BECOMING IMMORTALITY KEYWORDS : IMMANENCYSujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Hyperrealism Photorealism Radical realism Post-pop realism Sharp-focus realism Super-realism Artificial realism New New York naturalism New realism Mental philosophy Nomenclature Proper names Terminology Life after death Article Frenchmen (French people) Group discussion Human fertilization Fertilization, Human EthologyCiter ce document
MARIO TEODORO RAMÍREZ, « DEVENIR INMORTAL. LA CRÍTICA DE QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX A LA FILOSOFÍA DE LA INMANENCIA DE GILLES DELEUZE », Signos Filosóficos, ID : 10670/1.bd4d30...
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
: This article makes a brief presentation of the critique of Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy given by the French philosopher Quentin Meillassoux, initiatior of the so-called speculative realism (one of the names for the new realism that currently spreads over the philosophical scope). The latter critiques the insuffi cient character of the conception of immanence held by the former. Firstly, I give an account of the ar- guments offered by Meillassoux, and, then I refl ect on the discussion about immanence regarding the problem of meaning and the limits of atheism , as a general feature of modern thought.
