Why Using Religious Arguments in the Euthanasia Discussion is Problematic

Fiche du document

Date

1 juin 2021

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
10.18359/rlbi.5450

Organisation

SciELO

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Theodoor A. Boer, « Why Using Religious Arguments in the Euthanasia Discussion is Problematic », Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, ID : 10670/1.bfihcc


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

: In discussions about assisted dying (euthanasia, assisted suicide), those who argue ‘against' legalisation often reason from a religious angle, whereas those ‘in favour' adopt a secular stance. The Dutch experience is more nuanced: here, euthanasia advocacy largely originated from protestant religious believers. In this contribution, I criticise the use of religious arguments favouring any specific position. Religion may provide a heuristic context to explore norms relevant in the discussion, and religion may help us formulate our personal stance. But when it comes to societal debates (often focusing on whether or not to legalise euthanasia), we should concentrate on legal, societal, empirical, and ethical arguments that are understandable to all.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en