12 février 2024
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2239-4028
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2280-7853
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Oleksiy Stovba, « Is law possible during the war? Specificity of the corporeal experience », Phenomenology and Mind, ID : 10670/1.bp1zwj
In the theory and philosophy of law, war is often considered as a legal remedy. For example, according to H. Kelsen, war is a sanction of international law. These sanctions, like sanctions in national law, consist in the forcible deprivation of life, liberty, and other goods, notably of economic value. In war, human beings are killed, maimed, imprisoned, and national or private property is destroyed. By way of reprisals, national or private property is confiscated and other legal rights are infringed. At the same time, it seems clear that the human experience in conditions such as suffering, pain, and death, has nothing in common with law. The decision of a sovereign state to start a war means a rejection to recognize both the norm of law as well as the generalized Other. Then, despite all the norms and guarantees of international law, the living experience of human beings during war is an experience of lawlessness, because they are harmed and at the same time not even recognized as legal subjects. Therefore, in order to answer the question about whether law is possible during war, we have to clarify in what way law exists outside the traditional norms of law, whether positive or natural.