Differentiated evaluation of counter-conditioned stimuli as a function of right-wing authoritarianism
Fiche du document
30 juillet 2021
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.c76e28...
- hal: hal-03312622
- doi: 10.32872/spb.6593
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.32872/spb.6593
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
authoritarianism attitude change evaluative counter-conditioning -bio] -bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior -bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive SciencesSujets proches
Natural science Sciences Science of scienceCiter ce document
Amélie Bret et al., « Differentiated evaluation of counter-conditioned stimuli as a function of right-wing authoritarianism », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.32872/spb.6593
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Right Wing Authoritarianism (i.e., RWA) is associated with enhanced conservatism and social prejudice. Because research linking RWA to attitudes is largely correlational (i.e., it provides control for neither RWA nor attitude learning), it is not clear how RWA relates to attitude learning dynamics. We addressed this question in 11 evaluative conditioning experiments that ensured rigorous control of the affective learning setting. Results from two integrative data analyses suggest that (i) individuals scoring higher in RWA show a stronger acquisition of positive attitudes, and that (ii) the residuals of this stronger acquisition remain even after exposure to counterattitudinal information. Implications of these findings for research on RWA and its link to social prejudice are discussed.
