Evaluation of three pedestrian phasing with audible pedestrian signals configurations in Quebec City (Canada): an exploratory study of blind or visually impaired persons’ sense of safety, preferences, and expectations
Fiche du document
20 avril 2023
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.c87efa...
- hal: hal-04299293
- doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2200260
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/09638288.2023.2200260
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/licences/copyright/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Visual impairment Audible pedstrian signals Accessibility Inclusive city Participatory researchSujets proches
Blindness--Patients Blind persons Blind peopleCiter ce document
François Routhier et al., « Evaluation of three pedestrian phasing with audible pedestrian signals configurations in Quebec City (Canada): an exploratory study of blind or visually impaired persons’ sense of safety, preferences, and expectations », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1080/09638288.2023.2200260
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
PurposeThis exploratory study aimed to evaluate the preferences, expectations, and sense of safety of blind or visually impaired persons regarding three types of pedestrian phasing with audible pedestrian signals configurations that exist in Quebec City (Canada). These include: 1) exclusive phasing with non-directional audible pedestrian signals; 2) exclusive phasing with directional audible pedestrian signals; and 3) concurrent phasing with directional audible pedestrian signals.MethodsThirty-two blind or visually impaired persons were asked to complete a survey. Their preferences and expectations regarding audible pedestrian signals were documented through a series of simulations. Their sense of safety regarding the three existing configurations were also documented. Subsequently, semi-directed, individual interviews with 11 of the individuals who had completed the survey were conducted to build off the collected information.ResultsNo formal consensus regarding many of the issues discussed were established as participants’ responses varied too significantly. However, findings suggest that the exclusive phasing with directional audible pedestrian signals configuration is perceived to be the safest option by the participants.ConclusionThis study may have practical implications on the design of intersections (e.g., selection of a type of pedestrian phasing with audible pedestrian signal) and the training of blind or visually impaired pedestrians.
