Evaluating criticality of strategic metals: Are the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and usual concentration thresholds still relevant?

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108208

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licences

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Sujets proches En

Metallic elements

Citer ce document

Pauline Bucciarelli et al., « Evaluating criticality of strategic metals: Are the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and usual concentration thresholds still relevant? », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108208


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

This paper aims to evaluate the criticality of strategic metals by (i) investigating the validity of the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) for assessing the supply risk aspect of criticality and (ii) determining an appropriate threshold for using this indicator in the context of criticality studies. Relying on a large panel of 33 strategic metals over the 1995–2021 period, our findings show that the variation of HHI has more impact on metal prices at lower HHI levels and question the existence of a threshold that clearly distinguishes high-risk markets from less risky ones based on their concentration levels. Overall, we show that using the HHI as a supply risk indicator, especially in conjunction with a threshold, may result in underestimating risks in less concentrated markets.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines