DNA diagenesis and palaeogenetic analysis : Critical assessment and methodological progress

Fiche du document

Date

5 septembre 2008

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.041

Collection

Archives ouvertes




Citer ce document

Mélanie Pruvost et al., « DNA diagenesis and palaeogenetic analysis : Critical assessment and methodological progress », HAL-SHS : archéologie, ID : 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.041


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Palaeogenetic data obtained from fossilizing or fossil bones and teeth are of great importance to studies of vertebrate evolution, human biological and cultural evolution, plant and animal domestication and reconstructions of palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology. These studies are based on the retrieval of previous termDNAnext term preserved in fossilizing bones and teeth. previous termDNAnext term is present in fossils, if at all, in only very small amounts, which makes its amplification with PCR necessary for detailed sequence analysis. Erroneous nucleotides can be incorporated during in vitro amplification either because of post-mortem base damage of the original previous termDNAnext term template or simply because the fidelity of previous termDNAnext term polymerases is not absolute and can be decreased by suboptimal buffer conditions or possibly by compounds in the fossil extracts. These erroneously introduced nucleotides can be mistaken for authentic mutations of the ancient sequence compared to the closest extant sequence. Moreover, contamination by modern previous termDNA,next term which is not chemically modified and therefore a better substrate for the Taq polymerase, can also lead to erroneous results. Here, we will present the procedures that we have developed in order to (i) ensure negligible mutagenicity of the PCR reaction, (ii) eliminate contamination by previous termDNAnext term molecules originating from previous PCR reactions and cloning procedures, (iii) prevent contamination with modern previous termDNAnext term of fossil bones and teeth during and after their excavation, and (iv) prevent degradation of ancient previous termDNAnext term after excavation. Finally, we will discuss our results on previous termDNAnext term preservation as a function of the taphonomy of the skeletal part that is analyzed and of the depositional context of preservation.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en