Assessing the morphological alteration of river reaches from 15 years of measurements: French hydromorphological database and indicators (Carhyce)
Fiche du document
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.d1b803...
- hal: hal-05018398
- doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109737
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109737
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Frenchmen (French people)Citer ce document
Frédéric Gob et al., « Assessing the morphological alteration of river reaches from 15 years of measurements: French hydromorphological database and indicators (Carhyce) », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109737
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
To improve fresh water ecological quality, river managers have to assess the geomorphological functioning of the river system and sometimes restore it. Despite noticeable efforts made in recent years by the geomorphological community, hydro-morphological assessment methods and tools are still called for and needed. In France, river managers may rely on the Carhyce catalogue built by the French Biodiversity Agency and its partners over 15 years. This is a unique database allowing the characterization of the hydromorphology of French rivers. It is based on a standardized field protocol that entails a survey of the bankfull geometry of a reach 14 times the length of the river width. To date, >2500 river reaches of all type of rivers present on the French territory have been surveyed and the related data are freely available via a web interface, where they have been formatted and presented in the form of tables, graphs, sketches and indices. In addition, a morphological index has been produced to help identify and measure potential alterations of the physical functioning of the reaches. To do so >500 reaches have been identified as references to build reach average hydraulic geometry relationships. Those reference models allow the morphological deviation from the regional reference situation to be determined. This paper presents the Carhyce catalogue and the Global Morphological Index (GMI), as well as several examples of how it may be used. The limits and benefits of the Carhyce data are discussed and the GMI is compared to a welluse index of morphological quality.
