Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.dbvq20
- halshs: halshs-01347336
- doi: 10.1332/030557311X603592
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1332/030557311X603592
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
welfare regimes ideal types comparative social policy three worlds of welfare capitalism european typology Decommodification Defamiliarisation defamilialisation oecdSujets proches
Work, Method of Industry (Psychology) Method of work State planning National planning Scientific research Science research Science--ResearchCiter ce document
Emanuele Ferragina et al., « Welfare regime debate: past, present, futures? », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10.1332/030557311X603592
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The seminal work by Esping-Andersen (1990) has transformed and inspired social policy research over the past two decades. Various contributions have confirmed his typology, while others have challenged, and expanded, it from substantive and methodological perspectives. This article contributes to this debate in two ways. First, it provides a comprehensive analysis of the different typologies proposed in the literature, employing the concept of 'ideal types'. Second, it elaborates new directions for research along three dimensions: (1) improving measurement validity by linking macro and micro data to overcome assumptions, largely based on the average (production) worker; (2) assessing the reliability of typologies over time; (3) systematically integrating both the work– welfare as well as the care–welfare dimensions.