Fiche du document
2018
- handle: 10670/1.dcxwhy
- hal: hal-01992420
- doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.002
- PRODINRA: 409633
- WOS: 000432447000017
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.002
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
positional concerns Algeria financial preferences framing D - Microeconomics/D.D0 - General D - Microeconomics/D.D1 - Household Behavior and Family EconomicsSujets proches
Mechanical properties testing Relevancy Pertinence Specie Monetary question Money, Primitive Currency Standard of value Funds Funding Family Family structure Families--Social aspects Families--Social conditions Family life Structure, Family Family relationships Relationships, Family Economic theory Political economy Maghreb Barbary States Maghrib North Africa Finance, commerce, confiscations, etc Animal behavior Habits and behavior Biography--Ancestry Relations with family Biography--Descendants Biography--Family AncestryCiter ce document
Assia Houfaf Khoufaf et al., « Positional concerns and framing effects in financial preferences », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.002
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
We examine the relevance of relative standings in the financial domain. We introduced innovative hypotheses by testing whether framing (gain versus loss, risk level, amounts versus percentage, and money origin) affects stated positional preferences. Based on a quasi-experimental survey in Algeria (North Africa), our results show that while egalitarian concerns are prevalent in financial preferences among participants, positional and absolute states are also selected by a significant proportion of respondents. We also found some support to the insight that positional preferences are affected by framing, since loss/gain and risk framings are found to be significant. In other words, the proportion of respondents having positional preferences was found to be significantly higher in the gain (respectively, risky) framing, compared to a symmetric loss (respectively, certain) situation.