Fiche du document
30 mai 2016
- handle: 10670/1.drwc53
- halshs: halshs-01323475
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Non-indutrial private forest owner biodiversity program motivation crowding-out adoption decision C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods/C.C6 - Mathematical Methods • Programming Models • Mathematical and Simulation Modeling/C.C6.C60 - General H - Public Economics/H.H4 - Publicly Provided Goods/H.H4.H41 - Public Goods Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation/Q.Q2.Q23 - Forestry Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation/Q.Q2.Q28 - Government Policy Z - Other Special Topics/Z.Z1 - Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology/Z.Z1.Z13 - Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology • Social and Economic StratificationSujets proches
Child placingCiter ce document
Philippe Polomé, « Forest Owners Motivations for Adopting Programs of Biodiversity Protection », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10670/1.drwc53
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The results of a survey of private forest owners on adoption of a number of current programs, that include biodiversity protection to some degree, are presented. Adoption amounts to 22% for all the programs jointly, and is shown to depend on economic, social and ethical motives, with significant crowding-out between the economic and ethical motives, but not with social motives. Adoption of each program is strongly negatively correlated to each other. Nearly no respondent adopted the Natura 2000 program. The results constitute a test of the " reputational crowding-out " theory of Bénabou and Tirole (2006)