Fiche du document
27 août 2024
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.e29369...
- hal: hal-04682918
- doi: 10.1515/elen-2024-0006
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/elen-2024-0006
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Aristotle natural philosophy zoology botany nutritive power Aristotle natural philosophy zoology botany nutritive powerSujets proches
Fauna Native fauna Native animals Beasts Wildlife Wild animals Animal kingdomCiter ce document
Justin Winzenrieth, « La botanique d’Aristote », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1515/elen-2024-0006
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Whereas several zoological Aristotelian works have been preserved, Aristotle is reported to have written only one short botanical treatise. Such reports seem to conflict with his self-described ambition to study plants as well as animals. Even though this treatise is now lost, the available evidence suggests that Aristotle had valid reasons to find the subject-matter of plants much less interesting, as their activities amount to a subset of what animals do. When studying attributes common to both plants and animals in the transmitted corpus, Aristotle systematically focuses on the case of the most complex animals and, once an explanatory model has been found, proceeds to apply it to the remaining cases with less details. I argue that this procedure, although it runs counters to the intuition that one ought to start with the most simple case, corresponds to a general scientific method. Consequently, most of Aristotle’s botany is found to be already encapsulated in the main results of his study of animals.
