Fiche du document
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.e7b066...
- isbn: 9780262363723
- hal: hal-02972143
- doi: 10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0013
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0013
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
peer review post-publication peer review bibliometrics retraction scholarly dissemination fraudSujets proches
Chrestomathies and readers Preschool readers English language--Chrestomathies English language--Readers Chrestomathies Peer rating Review, Peer Peer evaluationCiter ce document
David Pontille et al., « Peer Review: Readers in the Making of Scholarly Knowledge », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.7551/mitpress/11885.003.0013
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Driven by a constant process of specialization, the extension of judging instances to readers may appear as a reallocation of expertise, ewpowering ing a growing number of people in the name of distributed knowledge.In an ongoing context of revelations of massive scientific fraud, which often implicates editorial processes and journals themselves, the derelic- tion inherent to judging instances prior to publication has transformed themass of readers into a vital resource for unearthing error and fraud. Thus, peerdom shall be reshaped, as lay readers have now full access to a large part of the scientific literature and have become valued audiences as quantified end users of published articles
