Comparing Grand Strategies in the Modern World

Fiche du document

Discipline
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/2441/395cbbgeod8nka44e60hqqcm1t

Organisation

Sciences Po




Citer ce document

Thierry Balzacq et al., « Comparing Grand Strategies in the Modern World », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10670/1.e89nfk


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This chapter lays out the objectives of the volume, provides a new conceptual and methodological framework, and justifies case selection. It comprises three sections. The first section argues that a comparative approach to the study of grand strategy both highlights the constraints of contemporary single-country research and the opportunities presented by a systematic research design. The chapter’s second section evaluates the alternative definitions and competing theoretical traditions developed to study grand strategy. The authors argue in favor of an integration of these traditions within a single framework, coupled with an expanded universe of countries as viable cases. In the third section, the authors examine which systemic and domestic factors organically influence the ways in which states formulate and implement grand strategies. The chapter identifies criteria for better explanations about why individual states make specific choices, and provides threads that ensure the internal consistency of the book.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en