Fiche du document
1 octobre 2018
- handle: 10670/1.eil8n0
- hal: hal-01983064
- doi: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594138
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594138
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Language (New words, slang, etc.)Citer ce document
Céline Pieters et al., « How do humans read robotics? The matter of the lexical ambiguity resolution », HAL-SHS : linguistique, ID : 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594138
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The words used to describe robotic performances include a degree of ambiguity that the human brain should solve without difficulty. However, the language used in-and about-robotics seems to escape from the ordinary processing of lexical ambiguity resolution. In this paper, we argue that there is no lack of an adequate language for robotics but that the lexicon at hand is forced by our representations. We investigate the main representational issues of the notions that express robotic actions and dispositions (i.e. behaviors).