Fiche du document
2024
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.f37160...
- hal: hal-04817518
- doi: 10.56042/alis.v71i4.14254
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.56042/alis.v71i4.14254
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Pre-publication reviews Post-publication reviews Journal-led peer review Community-led peer review AcademicSujets proches
Reviews Reviews Reviews Theater reviews Reviews Television plays--Reviews Television reviews Reviews Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Book section Book reviews ReviewsCiter ce document
Dasapta Irawan et al., « Post-Publication Review: The Role of Science News Outlets and Social Media », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.56042/alis.v71i4.14254
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This article explores the significant role of post-publication review in maintaining research integrity and the potential of science news outlets and social media to improve the process. By examining recent cases, this article reveals the vulnerabilities of pre-publication peer review and suggests a more inclusive approach. The importance of broader public scrutiny is emphasized, as retractions in these cases occurred only after gaining significant attention on social media. The term "peer-review" should be expanded to include various experts and platforms beyond traditional academic journals. The incidents examined in this study underscore the necessity of openness and vigilance in maintaining research integrity, especially in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms. Researchers need to understand that research integrity extends beyond journal-led pre-publication reviews. They should also apply their scientific intellect by conducting post-publication reviews.
