Fiche du document
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.ff068b...
- hal: hal-05074919
- doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108661
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108661
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Biodiversity Green budgeting Harmful subsidies Sustainable pathways Biodiversity financing Public finance -bio]/BiodiversitySujets proches
Biological diversity Biotic diversity Diversity, Biological Diversification, Biological Biological diversification Grants Subventions Vouchers (Subsidies) Corporate subsidies Welfare, Corporate Government subsidies Business subsidies Corporate welfare Government aid Federal aidCiter ce document
Morgane Gonon et al., « Subsidies against Nature: A multidimensional framework for biodiversity-aligned national budgets », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108661
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Governments provide more than USD 800 billion annually in environmentally harmful subsidies at the global level despite international commitments. This paper introduces a novel and replicable framework for identifying biodiversity-harmful subsidies within national budgets. Our multidimensional approach is based on the five drivers of biodiversity loss: land use change, resource exploitation, climate change, pollution, and invasive species. Our framework evaluates subsidies across seven economic sectorstransport, housing, industry, agriculture, livestock, power generation, and digital deployment-based on their expected biodiversity impact (harmful, positive, mixed, neutral, or unclassifiable). We apply this framework to the French national budget and find that, in 2022, €27.14 billion were allocated to subsidize harmful activities. Pollution is the most financially supported driver of biodiversity loss. Our analysis also reveals significant trade-offs, with 25% of climate-positive subsidies exacerbating land use pressures. The study calls for a sector-specific approach to subsidy reform. By codeveloping this framework with biodiversity experts and public authorities, we provide a decision-support tool to align public investments with pathways towards sustainability.
