Fiche du document
29 septembre 2010
- handle: 10670/1.fnk58t
Ce document est lié à :
http://uri.gbv.de/document/gvk:ppn:635772760
public , all rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Mots-clés
book Book ddc:330 für Harvesting bereitgestellt Klasse ASujets proches
Blanks (Forms) Forms, blanks, etc Blank forms Hours (Time) Technological transfer Transfer of technology Applied science Arts, Useful Useful arts Science, Applied Natural science Sciences Science of science Community development, Rural Rural development--Social aspects Rural community development Integrated rural development Rural economic development Regional development Development, Rural Rehabilitation, Rural Rural development--Citizen participation Scientific research Science research Science--Research State planning Regional development Regional planning--Government policy Human assets Human beings--Economic value Human resources Crops--Harvesting Community development--Government policy Regional development Community development--Citizen participation Businesses Firms Companies Enterprises Business organizations Organizations, Business Relations--Foreign countries Relations (Canon law)Citer ce document
Thomas Sauer et al., « Forms and regional distribution of knowledge transfer by German universities », Digitale Bibliothek Thüringen, ID : 10670/1.fnk58t
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
For the first time the transfer activities of two different German university types - the Friedrich Schiller University (FSU) and the University of Applied Sciences Jena (FH Jena) - were documented in parallel over all departments and channels of technology transfers with regard to their regional significance. Five groups of transfer activities are distinguished in the study: (1) those oriented on human capital, (2) those oriented on classic research and development, (3) those oriented on enterprises, (4) those oriented on direct transfers and (5) informal knowledge transfer channels. The results show that the traditional R&D-activities of the universities for the region are embedded into important supplemental transfer channels. In addition the radii of the external relations of the two universities are complementary: FH Jena has a stronger regional bearing, while FSU is more strongly active supra-regionally and internationally. It is possible that stronger support of the university faculty's activities establishing knowledge transfer could increase the regional economic impact of such activity. -- Innovation systems ; technology transfer ; regional development ; Universities ; know-how-transfer