Fiche du document
2020
- handle: 10670/1.fzptgz
- hal: hal-02377972
- doi: 10.1515/tlr-2019-2043
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/tlr-2019-2043
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Construction Architectural engineering Construction Buildings--Design and construction Engineering, Architectural Western architecture (Western countries) Building design Construction Buildings--Design and construction Architecture, Western (Western countries)Citer ce document
Waltraud Paul et al., « Existential and locative constructions in Mandarin Chinese », HAL-SHS : linguistique, ID : 10.1515/tlr-2019-2043
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Despite previous studies (cf. among others C.-T. defining characteristics of existential sentences in Chinese (including potential equivalents of locative inversion in English) have remained controversial. This is shown to be due to the failure to acknowledge the existence of two different constructions, the existential construction (ExC) 'Ø V DP' where a sentence-initial phrase indicating location (PlaceP) is not required, on the one hand, and the locative construction (LoC) with an obligatory PlaceP, on the other: 'PlaceP V DP'. Only the ExC can serve as a diagnostic context for unaccusative verbs, whereas the LoC allows for a wide range of verbs, including a subset of unergative verbs. Furthermore, two types of LoC need to be distinguished, depending on the type of aspect (perfective aspect-le vs imperfective aspect-zhe), giving rise to different semantics. Both have, however, in common that the PlaceP occupies the subject position (SpecTP), not the topic position, and that it is merged in SpecTP, not moved there, as evidenced by the systematic lack of a corresponding source structure with the PlaceP in postverbal position.