Modal History versus Counterfactual History: History as Intention

Fiche du document

Date

8 août 2021

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Sujets proches En

Frontier troubles Annals

Citer ce document

Vasil Penchev, « Modal History versus Counterfactual History: History as Intention », HAL-SHS : philosophie, ID : 10670/1.gzcywv


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

The distinction of whether real or counterfactual history makes sense only post factum. However, modal history is to be defined only as ones' intention and thus, ex-ante. Modal history is probable history, and its probability is subjective. One needs phenomenological "epoché" in relation to its reality (respectively, counterfactuality). Thus, modal history describes historical "phenomena" in Husserl's sense and would need a specific application of phenomenological reduction, which can be called historical reduction. Modal history doubles history just as the recorded history of historiography does it. That doubling is a necessary condition of historical objectivity including one's subjectivity: whether actors', ex-ante or historians', post factum. The objectivity doubled by ones' subjectivity constitutes a "hermeneutical circle".

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en